By Eke Macdonald Ndubuisi - TBP
27, April 2017

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu; IPOB Leader with 3 other co-accused in court - Abuja
Following the current pronouncement and verdict reached upon by Justice Binta Nyako of the Abuja Federal High Court; she has disgraced the Nigeria Judiciary system beyond limits that the body has become incapable of averring sound judgment that will raise high level of moral standards to all and sundry in the Nigerian bondage.

We take into cognizance the fact that Justice Binta Nyako's reason(s) of granting Nnamdi Kanu's bail on conditions was enmeshed on health grounds but that is far from the truth; the truth must be told at all times no matter who is involved. This sole reason proclaimed by this biased Judge is out of content and has nothing to do with the meat of the master.

Recall that there was a spark of avid of tyranny in Rtd. General Mohammadu Buhari to jail Nnamdi Kanu by all means when in his maiden chat vowed that he tyrant Mohammadu Buhari cannot release Nnamdi Kanu on bail no matter what the law uphold; he also committed perjury by saying that he Nnamdi Kanu came into the British government created Nigeria without passports which is an impeachable offence of lying under oath with respect to the 1999 Nigeria constitution. Mohammadu Buhari arrogates power to himself when he set-in his tentacles to destabilize the Nigeria National Assembly; both the upper and lower house became a kangaroo court yard where good laws affecting the masses are ought to be implemented.

Mohammadu Buhari as a ruthless power monger became a cobweb to the Nigeria Judiciary Council when he knew that the body will not be intimidated into cowardice went ahead to kidnapped judges in a Nazi gestapo-style with his unconstitutional -DSS; it is unfortunate that the judiciary fell to this Mohammadu Buhari's gimmick of being a tarantula.

Tyrant Mohammadu Buhari slammed Nnamdi Kanu and his IPOB with eleven count charges of which Justice Binta Nyako quashed six out of the eleven count charges for lacking merits, while on the go when the trial was about to commence she introduced sharia law as an effective way for her to pass judgment.

If Justice Binta Nyako is not biased in the first place why did she pushed aside the motion moved by Nnamdi Kanu's defense team to allow his client to vacate the prison confinement for a medical examination as his client health is deteriorating seriously because of the poor facilities within the prison's reach; Justice Binta Nyako countered it that on no grounds will she allow or use health reasons to grant Nnamdi Kanu bail and warned that Nnamdi Kanu's legal team should shove this motion down as she will not accept it or allow it to stand.

We are analyzing these facts not in a stampede, what crime has Nnamdi Kanu committed against the Nigeria state that demand he must pay N 300.000.000 (three hundred million naira) to the Nigeria government as sureties? Is Justice Binta Nyako insinuating that Nnamdi Kanu must buy his way to freedom when she cannot find him guilty before her court room? Justice Binta Nyako through her pronouncements has confined Nnamdi Kanu's movement when the Nigeria constitution is against such? Has Nnamdi Kanu become a common criminal that he should be placed under probation?

Nnamdi Kanu is a freedom fighter who is using the United Nations Charter to engage the Nigeria government for the freedom of his people; Two Nigerian Justices granted Kanu release unconditionally to which tyrant Mohammadu Buhari disobeyed, flouted it on the ground that self-determination of a people is a treasonable offence to which this day tyrant Mohammadu Buhari cannot present his facts to buttress why he kept Nnamdi Kanu in prison incommunicado.

Nnamdi Kanu is a Prince of Afara kingdom and by virtue of his position will welcome and entertain people at all times. His rights to freedom of speech and expression as enshrined in the Nigeria constitution has been deliberately obliterated by this baised judge; that if Nnamdi Kanu do otherwise will push her to recall him back to prison room; Nnamdi Kanu is believed to be a Hebrew fellow by faith with this rulings of not to be seen in a gathering of ten(10) persons, is this biased judge telling us that Nnamdi Kanu cannot congregate with his fellow Hebrew worshippers? When in the Nigeria constitution did the freedom of worship obliterated? So Nnamdi Kanu is restricted from going to the bank, market, shopping malls, recreation centers, viewing centers since he is likely not to be in a place where more than ten persons are.

The United Nations should wake up to her responsibilities as a world body than as it is been seen as a family meeting of drunks without set objectives; what happened to the rights of the indigenous people to self-determination as it's enshrined in their documents. Nigeria government and her judiciary is violating this law. Nigeria government has committed regime crimes against humanity in different fronts. We demand and seek for a redress that all these unmerited sanctions against Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB that he commands be lifted.

Editor/Publisher: Chinwe Korie
For your articles, reach Chinwe below;
Twitter: @ckorie17


Vestibulum bibendum felis sit amet dolor auctor molestie. In dignissim eget nibh id dapibus. Fusce et suscipit orci. Aliquam sit amet urna lorem. Duis eu imperdiet nunc, non imperdiet libero.

Post A Comment: