BINTA NYAKO: NIGERIA FEDERAL HIGH COURT; A STRONGHOLD OF INJUSTICE; WE ARE NOT IN A HURRY TO LEAVE PRISON, NIGERIA MUST BE DEFEATED IN THEIR COURT

By Kelechi OKORIE Writes for TBP
March 24, 2017


Tension is high! Nigeria government seems to have realized their mistakes by arresting Nnamdi Kanu, leader of Indigenous People of Biafra and other accused illegally. Nigerian clone-robe-corpse might abscond air space in guise of medical tour or uninvited conference as usual though; he was questioned to give account of his medical expenditure which could restrict his sudden disappearance on 20th and 21st March. As Biafra propagation has taken another dimension every Tom and Harry is no exception in the struggle now. Inmates in Biafraland are holding family meetings in the prison; and children are not left out in calling for the unconditional release of Nnamdi Kanu.

Frontline Oduduwa Republic Campaigner has urged IPOB to arm themselves not knowing that truth is more sophisticated than armament, which Biafra uses to send Nigeria to the grave yard. It is too late to cry when the head is already off from the neck. Buhari’s political gangsters (DSS) must be ashamed as they are running helter skater to defend their laughable remaining five count charges. Perhaps, Biafra has and shall keep having an edge over Nigerian government's myopic perception and reasoning. Their worthless six count charges was struck out by Binta Nyako, the presiding judge on the ground of no prove of evidence.

The remaining charges are count 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8. The Charges are as follow:

Count 1 “Conspiracy to commit treasonable felony contrary to section 516 of the Criminal Code Act”. Mohammadu Buhari, having known he was guilty of treasonable felony for overthrowig a democratically elected president Shehu Shagari on 31st December, 1983 now intends to transfer his crime to Nnamdi Kanu and other defendants that is punishable under the law. The guess charge without specific date, place committed, makes it baseless, null and void for any competent court to debate on such a senseless charge.

Count 2: Kanu, is charged with treasonable felony for broadcasting in London between 2014 and 2015, calling for the secession of Republic of Biafra from Nigeria. Biafra has been in existence for over 5000 years. Almagamation of Nigeria was not agreed upon by the component nationalities but rather were forced to surrender by the colonial masters. It is only in a slave camp that a massage of freedom is construed to mean treasonable felony. Nnamdi Kanu only speaks the mind of Biafrans and hence an ambassador of freedom.

Count 4 accused Kanu “publication of defamatory matter contrary to section 375 of the Criminal Code Act”. Defamation of character is a civil matter, and using tax payers money to prosecute his individual personal image is ultra vires, and when the statement was made he (Buhari) was not the president of Nigeria, hence the Federal High Court has no jurisdiction to debate such case.

Recall, Nnamdi Kanu, was reportedly said “we are not in a hurry, we shall release declassified details on how/why we refer Buhari to as a terrorist, paedophile and an idiot. Believe you me; this case is now getting more interesting, we shall call the attention of international media and foreign observers to witness our testimonies. In that same court shall we destroy Nigeria. We can never run away from this case, we are Biafrans we don’t run away from task.

Count 6 accused Kanu, “Importation of goods contrary to section 47(2) of the Custom and Excise Management Act”. For this argument to be won beyond reasonable doubt, Biafrans are hopefully to see Nigerian Government open the goods imported by Nnamdi Kanu and confirm with date if it was a contraband goods and also determine if an offender in such cases should be detained for more than a year without fair trial. If importation of a transmitter is a criminal offence, why is it other radio stations are broadcasting without custom’s interruption?

Count 8 accused Madubugwu; possession of one Emerald Magnum Pump Action gun. Should Madubugwu be persecuted for possessing one licensed fire arm? What about Fulani Herdsman that have been killing innocent people on daily basis with sophisticated ammunitions; how many of them were detained, tortured or arraigned in a court? As Buhari’s Fulani killers squad have turned Biafraland a slaughtering arena, was it not reasonable for one to arm itself for self-defense as Madubugwu did? Spectators all over the world are looking forward to see DSS scratch their empty skull to answer questions on the charges brought before the court or is the Judge going to succumb to federal government pressure? Only time shall tell.

Editor/Publisher: Chinwe Korie
Chinwe could be reached via;
Twitter: @ckorie17
Facebook: facebook.com/ckorie17
Email: ckorie17@gmail.com
Axact

Axact

Vestibulum bibendum felis sit amet dolor auctor molestie. In dignissim eget nibh id dapibus. Fusce et suscipit orci. Aliquam sit amet urna lorem. Duis eu imperdiet nunc, non imperdiet libero.

Post A Comment:

0 comments: