Published on the Biafra Post
March 5, 2026
This week, I deliberately decided to focus my attention on the growing tension surrounding the Iran–Israel/USA conflict rather than continuing discussions about Onyendu and his siblings. Unfortunately, Madam Nnennaya Anya, the former Head of Finance of IPOB—widely accused by many of financial misconduct—has once again dragged me into her unwarranted and shameful claims of “transparency.”
Madam Nnennaya Anya recently attempted to justify her actions by claiming that she transferred $100,000 to Barr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor and Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) for legal services rendered in defense of Onyendu.
Let me be clear: I am not here to argue whether or not there exists a receipt bearing the name of Barr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor. The reason is simple. Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) was personally introduced into Onyendu’s legal team by Barr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that any transaction made in the name of Mike Ozekhome (SAN) was also done in coordination with Barr. Ejiofor. In the same way that any legal victory secured by Chief Ozekhome would naturally be shared with Barr. Ejiofor, since they were working within the same legal framework.
That is my honest submission, without bias.
However, let us pause for a moment and ask Madam Nnennaya Anya some important questions.
She claims her public explanation regarding legal payments is for the sake of transparency.
But is it truly transparency, or selective transparency?
If she is genuinely committed to transparency, can she use the same platform to disclose how much she transferred to the many lawyers handling the case of Onyendu?
For example:
How much was transferred to Barr. Aloy Ejimakor?
How much to Barr. Maxwell Opara?
How much to Barr. Nnemeka Ejiofor?
How much to Chief Godwin Kanu Agabi (SAN)?
How much to Bruce Fein, the former U.S. attorney who has been involved in advocacy for the case?
Furthermore, transparency should not stop with lawyers alone.
How much was transferred to:
Kingsley Kanu (Kanunta)
Emmanuel Kanu (Fineboy)
And how much was transferred to their associates and in-laws—individuals who many Biafrans believe have benefited financially from IPOB contributions?
Madam Nnennaya Anya must understand that true transparency cannot be selective.
Biafrans around the world are demanding a comprehensive accountability report—from A to Z—covering every contribution made by IPOB family members globally, beginning from the day she assumed office as Head of Finance until the day she left.
This includes, but is not limited to:
IPOB Monthly Dues (2012–2022)
IPOB Defense Fund ($300 per registered IPOB members in the diaspora)
IPOB Odoziobodo Levy
IPOB Legal Levy
IPOB ESN Contributions
IPOB Liaising Office Contributions
Many of us still have our payment receipts intact.
The day will come when individuals will be required to give full account of these funds before the law. Anyone found guilty of misappropriating IPOB funds must face justice.
Let it be known that patience should never be mistaken for weakness.
Justice awaits anyone involved in the mismanagement or diversion of IPOB funds. When that time comes, accountability will not be optional.
“Patience should never be mistaken for weakness. When the time for accountability arrives, every figure must answer to the facts.”
Anyi Kings March 5, 2026
Post A Comment:
0 comments: