REJOINDER: BIAFRA & AGITATION FOR SECESSION; CONCERNED URHOBO RAISES DISTURBING ISSUE
By Ifeanyi Chijioke - TBP
April 3, 2017
(Finally; the writer seems not to be in touch with reality; the big question is, with the state of Nigeria, who wants to remain in Nigeria? With Boko Haram ravaging citizens; who wants to be a citizen of such battlefield? With electricity not working anywhere and roads being a death trap and taking away lives of citizens, who wants to be in such country? A corrupt country her politicians destroy the future of her citizens; who wants to be in such country? A country without infrastructure and social amenity; that is ravaged by hunger, who wants to remain in such country? A country with people it calls minorities that have no say in the government, those minorities want to remain there? A country that produces nothing but suck and destroy the land of her citizens (minorities), travel abroad and leave citizens to die due to low standard hospitals, who wants to be in such country? If for nothing; Isoko, and Urhobo will never forgive Biafra that will leave them behind and they would rather fight to the last drop of blood to leave with Biafra than suffer religious hatred and exploitations in the hands of those that called them infidels. It is clear that the author is a mad man without brain; stepping into controversial water indeed)
I read an anonymous piece with the above caption and I felt it needs more than a rejoinder; I am very much aware that the article was not written by any Urhobo person, if people in far away Nasarawa are pleading to be part of Biafra, I don’t see how an Urhobo man can write such piece. It is also important that I reply that anonymous writer because there was a battle to conquer divide and rule strategy which is poised to be revived by Nigerian government after Nnamdi Kanu destroyed it, the article is a bullet shot to revive division. The author of the article did not disclose his name which is quite obvious that it came from an Arewa agent seeking to continue to hold the people of Biafra down. He has not really accepted the fact that Nnamdi Kanu has conquered their divide and rule strategy. No matter who the writer is; I will sufficiently address this reply and make sure his argument is not only disposed to the dustbin but disgraced and discouraged to rant on what he has no knowledge about.
I have comprehensively read the article and what the wayward writer was fighting is oil and not even the welfare of the people of Urhobo and Isoko land. He made it clear that Nigeria will fight for that oil (in that part of Biafra) until nothing is left in the land. This is one of the flaws of that article; the wayward writer thought we are all fools, he can obviously tell Biafrans in river-line or Urhobo clan that our business with you is for you to remain slaves and feed your master while other slaves can go. I want to quickly bring to the knowledge of the agent (writer) that in the next 50 years; innovations will overtake oil and it would be worthless. Solar energy will take its toll on oil and many other inventions devoid of oil- more a better way to control climate change. It is imperative to also remind the agent (writer) that Igbo speaking (hinter-land) part of Biafra has oil. Anambra has oil, Imo has oil and Abia has oil as well, the States without oil have natural resources worth more than oil, coal, lime stone, zinc and many more. Just as Nigeria is hell bent on oil; Biafra needs her complete house for the purpose of spiritual stability and peace. Posterity will disastrously judge a Biafra that did not go with her complete house. Urhobo and Isoko as mentioned in that article are of same bloodline with Anioma, Igbo, Igbanke, Igala and many more. Biafra cannot leave her blood brothers for any reason; if it warrants war, Biafra shall go for it to ensure a complete house of Israel.
I have patiently waited for a comprehensive reply but it falls within my class to write this rejoinder. The writer is a fraudster by firstly claiming to speak for Urhobo-Isokoland; he signaled that on behalf of Urhobo-Isokoland people, that Biafra map is not accepted by them. This is a fraudulent move to start with; hiding your identity and then positing to speak for a people. When Oduduwa included Warri in her map; we all saw how apex body vehemently condemned Oduduwa people. I called Isokoland coordinator of IPOB; he was shocked at such piece and only informed me that enemies are working hard to disintegrate the children of God and devour them. I will confidently and comprehensively reply the writer who raised thoughtless points in his piece; because I have the support of Isokoland not only to counter but disgrace the idiot-writer. I will gradually pick his points and lecture him on those points because Chukwu Okike Abiama determined that IPOB will restore Biafra under Nnamdi Kanu’s watch.
Number 1 point he raised: the writer claimed that South-south is historically not part of Biafra, he further said that the tribes have never heard or pledged for Biafra. The first impression here is the writer is a poor student of history; one begins to wonder how FG contracted such a poor historian to address issue of history. History made it clear that Biafra never engaged in any conquest or tried to coerce her citizens, they are core republicans. This is same with their present life; a man gives birth to a male child and at certain age, the child leaves his home to anywhere he wants to build his own empire. He has right to change his language, name etc but one thing still binds them together, religion, value system, culture and anywhere you go, it never changes, and by virtue of that, history is traced to organic likeness? This is being used against the people of Biafra in this present generation; had Biafra engaged in conquest that her citizens must use same language and stay under a kingdom; this would not have been the case. The writer should be well taught that the man standing as the next Ojukwu of Biafra is Col. Joe Achuzai from his rubbish South-south.. The thoughtless writer should be informed that Philip Effiong is the second in command/deputy to Ojukwu and he is from South-south. I can’t go on and on because of space; but the writer woefully failed by saying that South-south never pledged or heard of Biafra, as a matter of fact, South-south is the face or head of Biafra agitation.
Number 2 point: the writer can go to Rivers and say South-south doesn’t know about Biafra or commiserate with it and I bet he would have himself to blame. He would not only face mob action but will be banished from the land. This poorly trained writer seems to only write from a closet; he has never left his closet or tried to know what is going-on in Old Easter Region. This writer is not aware that the stronghold of Biafra agitation is a State in his South-south rubbish- Rivers. The writer failed to grasp that Delta state is the most latent IPOB state and where did he get the idea that South-south are not agitating for Biafra or commiserating with it? This mentally disturbed writer also failed to see what has been going on in Abuja High Court where kings and leaders from South-south stormed to agitate for Biafra and Kanu’s release. This computer based agent also failed to know that Asari Dokubo who is considered the face of South-south is agitating more than anybody in Igbo speaking part of Biafra. By virtue of this awareness; the writer is either a citizen of UEA and not aware of Biafra agitation.
Number 3 point: the writer further said that Delta is not part of Biafra and questioned the emotion of agitators. It is very crucial that I bring to the awareness of this writer that Biafra is a religion to the agitators and this made them fanatics. There is no other sense if not Biafra and this is why nothing will stop them until Biafra is restored. Furthermore; the writer with no knowledge of history took a stance that Delta is not Biafra. Nigeria was formed on three cardinal points; the three cardinal points are the three nations that made up Nigeria. Summarily; if Delta is not Biafra, then it is either Oduduwa or Arewa and I await the sycophant-writer to prove to the world that Delta is not Biafra, because if it is not Biafra it is Oduduwa or Arewa and if it is not Oduduwa or Arewa, then it is Biafra. I am occupying my space with this issue of “Not Biafra” so this summary should help.
Number 4 point: the writer said a complete Biafra (Old Eastern region) is a multiethnic nation and as a result will make Biafra a failed nation. He further posited that ethnic groups are wary of major ones in Nigeria and that is what Biafra will become. Now the writer is showing his inferiority or inability to reason; this is what happens when a black monkey is deceitfully fighting a cause. I want to bring to the knowledge of the writer that what binds people together is not language or geographical positions. What binds people together are, value system, religion, culture etc, these bring brotherhood and makes clear that a people are from one place. In old Eastern region which is present day Biafra; there is no state with same language, Ebonyi, Abia, Delta, Rivers, Akwaibom, Anambra etc have no common language. Igbo language which can be the dominant language of the people of Biafra varies from one tongue to another and you cannot understand all. The writer must know that religion is the bane of Nigeria; opposing culture and value system, but in Old Eastern Nigeria, the case addressed itself. Old Eastern region shares same value system, religion, culture and this means they are one people from one source and one DNA. I cannot imagine a troublesome Biafra because blood binds them together unlike Nigeria where Muslims consider Old Eastern region conquered estate of infidels. Old Eastern Region is not a multiethnic region by virtue of religion, culture and value system, name is the only difference for the purpose of identity.
Number 5 point: the writer discussed about strategy and enigmatic leader; he criticized the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra. I have taken much space already and cannot go further; the reason the writer spent his time and energy to write is because of the effectiveness of Nnamdi Kanu’s leadership. The reason the writer is today saying Biafra can go with a part of her territory alone is because of Nnamdi Kanu. The reason the world is talking about Biafra is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy. The reason the word ‘Biafra’ was recognized by Microsoft is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy. The reason Biafra is a mainstream political discussion today is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy. The reason Nigeria is trembling today is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy and the reason Biafra must be restore is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy etc. If the writer can see that Biafra became what it is today because of Nnamdi Kanu; then he would learn to sing Kanu’s praises. Did I hear Donald Trump invited IPOB to be represented in his inauguration? Did I hear parliaments in EU, Britain and US congress are talking about Biafra? The writer is simply blind and deaf; I regret this rejoinder.
Finally; the writer seems not to be in touch with reality; the big question is, with the state of Nigeria, who wants to remain in Nigeria? With Boko Haram ravaging citizens; who wants to be a citizen of such battlefield? With electricity not working anywhere and roads being a death trap and taking away lives of citizens, who wants to be in such country? A corrupt country her politicians destroy the future of her citizens; who wants to be in such country? A country without infrastructure and social amenities; that is ravaged by hunger, who wants to remain in such country? A country with people it calls minorities that have no say in the government, those minorities want to remain there? A country that produces nothing but suck and destroy the land of her citizens (minorities), travel abroad and leave citizens to die due to low standard hospitals, who wants to be in such country? If for nothing; Isoko, and Urhobo will never forgive Biafra that will leave them behind and they would rather fight to the last drop of blood to leave with Biafra than suffer religious hatred and exploitations in the hands of those that called them infidels. It is clear that the author is a mad man without brain; stepping into controversial water indeed.
Editor/Publisher: Chinwe Korie
Twitter: @ckorie17
Facebook: facebook.com/ckorie17
Email: ckorie17@gmail.com
By Ifeanyi Chijioke - TBP
April 3, 2017
 |
| He did not allow his disability weigh him down from agitationg for his dream country; Biafra |
I read an anonymous piece with the above caption and I felt it needs more than a rejoinder; I am very much aware that the article was not written by any Urhobo person, if people in far away Nasarawa are pleading to be part of Biafra, I don’t see how an Urhobo man can write such piece. It is also important that I reply that anonymous writer because there was a battle to conquer divide and rule strategy which is poised to be revived by Nigerian government after Nnamdi Kanu destroyed it, the article is a bullet shot to revive division. The author of the article did not disclose his name which is quite obvious that it came from an Arewa agent seeking to continue to hold the people of Biafra down. He has not really accepted the fact that Nnamdi Kanu has conquered their divide and rule strategy. No matter who the writer is; I will sufficiently address this reply and make sure his argument is not only disposed to the dustbin but disgraced and discouraged to rant on what he has no knowledge about.
I have comprehensively read the article and what the wayward writer was fighting is oil and not even the welfare of the people of Urhobo and Isoko land. He made it clear that Nigeria will fight for that oil (in that part of Biafra) until nothing is left in the land. This is one of the flaws of that article; the wayward writer thought we are all fools, he can obviously tell Biafrans in river-line or Urhobo clan that our business with you is for you to remain slaves and feed your master while other slaves can go. I want to quickly bring to the knowledge of the agent (writer) that in the next 50 years; innovations will overtake oil and it would be worthless. Solar energy will take its toll on oil and many other inventions devoid of oil- more a better way to control climate change. It is imperative to also remind the agent (writer) that Igbo speaking (hinter-land) part of Biafra has oil. Anambra has oil, Imo has oil and Abia has oil as well, the States without oil have natural resources worth more than oil, coal, lime stone, zinc and many more. Just as Nigeria is hell bent on oil; Biafra needs her complete house for the purpose of spiritual stability and peace. Posterity will disastrously judge a Biafra that did not go with her complete house. Urhobo and Isoko as mentioned in that article are of same bloodline with Anioma, Igbo, Igbanke, Igala and many more. Biafra cannot leave her blood brothers for any reason; if it warrants war, Biafra shall go for it to ensure a complete house of Israel.
I have patiently waited for a comprehensive reply but it falls within my class to write this rejoinder. The writer is a fraudster by firstly claiming to speak for Urhobo-Isokoland; he signaled that on behalf of Urhobo-Isokoland people, that Biafra map is not accepted by them. This is a fraudulent move to start with; hiding your identity and then positing to speak for a people. When Oduduwa included Warri in her map; we all saw how apex body vehemently condemned Oduduwa people. I called Isokoland coordinator of IPOB; he was shocked at such piece and only informed me that enemies are working hard to disintegrate the children of God and devour them. I will confidently and comprehensively reply the writer who raised thoughtless points in his piece; because I have the support of Isokoland not only to counter but disgrace the idiot-writer. I will gradually pick his points and lecture him on those points because Chukwu Okike Abiama determined that IPOB will restore Biafra under Nnamdi Kanu’s watch.
Number 1 point he raised: the writer claimed that South-south is historically not part of Biafra, he further said that the tribes have never heard or pledged for Biafra. The first impression here is the writer is a poor student of history; one begins to wonder how FG contracted such a poor historian to address issue of history. History made it clear that Biafra never engaged in any conquest or tried to coerce her citizens, they are core republicans. This is same with their present life; a man gives birth to a male child and at certain age, the child leaves his home to anywhere he wants to build his own empire. He has right to change his language, name etc but one thing still binds them together, religion, value system, culture and anywhere you go, it never changes, and by virtue of that, history is traced to organic likeness? This is being used against the people of Biafra in this present generation; had Biafra engaged in conquest that her citizens must use same language and stay under a kingdom; this would not have been the case. The writer should be well taught that the man standing as the next Ojukwu of Biafra is Col. Joe Achuzai from his rubbish South-south.. The thoughtless writer should be informed that Philip Effiong is the second in command/deputy to Ojukwu and he is from South-south. I can’t go on and on because of space; but the writer woefully failed by saying that South-south never pledged or heard of Biafra, as a matter of fact, South-south is the face or head of Biafra agitation.
Number 2 point: the writer can go to Rivers and say South-south doesn’t know about Biafra or commiserate with it and I bet he would have himself to blame. He would not only face mob action but will be banished from the land. This poorly trained writer seems to only write from a closet; he has never left his closet or tried to know what is going-on in Old Easter Region. This writer is not aware that the stronghold of Biafra agitation is a State in his South-south rubbish- Rivers. The writer failed to grasp that Delta state is the most latent IPOB state and where did he get the idea that South-south are not agitating for Biafra or commiserating with it? This mentally disturbed writer also failed to see what has been going on in Abuja High Court where kings and leaders from South-south stormed to agitate for Biafra and Kanu’s release. This computer based agent also failed to know that Asari Dokubo who is considered the face of South-south is agitating more than anybody in Igbo speaking part of Biafra. By virtue of this awareness; the writer is either a citizen of UEA and not aware of Biafra agitation.
Number 3 point: the writer further said that Delta is not part of Biafra and questioned the emotion of agitators. It is very crucial that I bring to the awareness of this writer that Biafra is a religion to the agitators and this made them fanatics. There is no other sense if not Biafra and this is why nothing will stop them until Biafra is restored. Furthermore; the writer with no knowledge of history took a stance that Delta is not Biafra. Nigeria was formed on three cardinal points; the three cardinal points are the three nations that made up Nigeria. Summarily; if Delta is not Biafra, then it is either Oduduwa or Arewa and I await the sycophant-writer to prove to the world that Delta is not Biafra, because if it is not Biafra it is Oduduwa or Arewa and if it is not Oduduwa or Arewa, then it is Biafra. I am occupying my space with this issue of “Not Biafra” so this summary should help.
Number 4 point: the writer said a complete Biafra (Old Eastern region) is a multiethnic nation and as a result will make Biafra a failed nation. He further posited that ethnic groups are wary of major ones in Nigeria and that is what Biafra will become. Now the writer is showing his inferiority or inability to reason; this is what happens when a black monkey is deceitfully fighting a cause. I want to bring to the knowledge of the writer that what binds people together is not language or geographical positions. What binds people together are, value system, religion, culture etc, these bring brotherhood and makes clear that a people are from one place. In old Eastern region which is present day Biafra; there is no state with same language, Ebonyi, Abia, Delta, Rivers, Akwaibom, Anambra etc have no common language. Igbo language which can be the dominant language of the people of Biafra varies from one tongue to another and you cannot understand all. The writer must know that religion is the bane of Nigeria; opposing culture and value system, but in Old Eastern Nigeria, the case addressed itself. Old Eastern region shares same value system, religion, culture and this means they are one people from one source and one DNA. I cannot imagine a troublesome Biafra because blood binds them together unlike Nigeria where Muslims consider Old Eastern region conquered estate of infidels. Old Eastern Region is not a multiethnic region by virtue of religion, culture and value system, name is the only difference for the purpose of identity.
Number 5 point: the writer discussed about strategy and enigmatic leader; he criticized the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra. I have taken much space already and cannot go further; the reason the writer spent his time and energy to write is because of the effectiveness of Nnamdi Kanu’s leadership. The reason the writer is today saying Biafra can go with a part of her territory alone is because of Nnamdi Kanu. The reason the world is talking about Biafra is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy. The reason the word ‘Biafra’ was recognized by Microsoft is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy. The reason Biafra is a mainstream political discussion today is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy. The reason Nigeria is trembling today is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy and the reason Biafra must be restore is because of Nnamdi Kanu’s strategy etc. If the writer can see that Biafra became what it is today because of Nnamdi Kanu; then he would learn to sing Kanu’s praises. Did I hear Donald Trump invited IPOB to be represented in his inauguration? Did I hear parliaments in EU, Britain and US congress are talking about Biafra? The writer is simply blind and deaf; I regret this rejoinder.
Finally; the writer seems not to be in touch with reality; the big question is, with the state of Nigeria, who wants to remain in Nigeria? With Boko Haram ravaging citizens; who wants to be a citizen of such battlefield? With electricity not working anywhere and roads being a death trap and taking away lives of citizens, who wants to be in such country? A corrupt country her politicians destroy the future of her citizens; who wants to be in such country? A country without infrastructure and social amenities; that is ravaged by hunger, who wants to remain in such country? A country with people it calls minorities that have no say in the government, those minorities want to remain there? A country that produces nothing but suck and destroy the land of her citizens (minorities), travel abroad and leave citizens to die due to low standard hospitals, who wants to be in such country? If for nothing; Isoko, and Urhobo will never forgive Biafra that will leave them behind and they would rather fight to the last drop of blood to leave with Biafra than suffer religious hatred and exploitations in the hands of those that called them infidels. It is clear that the author is a mad man without brain; stepping into controversial water indeed.
Editor/Publisher: Chinwe Korie
Twitter: @ckorie17
Facebook: facebook.com/ckorie17
Email: ckorie17@gmail.com
Post A Comment:
0 comments: