TRENDING NOW

Recent Post Recent Post
View More

at 0
Biafra post

Report by Anyi Kings 
Published On the Biafra Post 
June 1, 2026 


In her Memorial Day address, the wife of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu strongly defended the leadership of IPOB under the Directorate of State (DOS), while criticizing individuals she described as enemies of the Biafra struggle.


Speaking on the controversy surrounding the so-called "100 Men," she insisted that they are not connected to the Biafra struggle but are merely errand runners serving Kanu's personal interests.


Drawing from the Bible, she declared:
"While men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat and went his way."


According to her, enemies have infiltrated the movement in an attempt to sow division and confusion. She described some of them as "flying monkeys" and others as "masquerades" working against the collective interest of the struggle.


Referring to her husband as "Onyendu," she stated that she had assured him that their duty was to confront and defeat those seeking to undermine the movement. She emphasized the need to protect what she described as a "big masquerade," referring to Kanu, noting that while a great masquerade may sometimes frighten even its own guardians, it ultimately returns to those entrusted with its care.


She reiterated her previous position that her role is to stand between the seen and unseen, helping her husband discern the truth and ensuring that the principles which united the movement are preserved through unity and collective purpose.


The IPOB leader's wife maintained that many issues would be resolved upon Kanu's release, but warned that those currently attempting to create division are the same "flying monkeys" and enemies who must not be allowed to succeed.


Reflecting on her recent visit home, she said she was moved to tears after witnessing the level of suffering among the people. She called on Biafrans in the diaspora to unite and contribute to rebuilding their homeland, expressing hope that it could one day surpass cities such as Dubai in development and prosperity.


She stressed that all people are equal before God and urged Biafrans to reject superiority complexes, embrace one another as brothers and sisters, support one another, and work together in pursuit of common goals.



According to her, unity remains the greatest weapon against those working against the movement.


She also appealed to members to abandon the quest for personal recognition and self-praise, urging everyone to work collectively, protect Onyendu, and support the DOS leadership.


Defending the Directorate of State, she argued that DOS has been managing the affairs of the movement even during periods when Kanu was free, questioning why certain individuals only emerge to attack the leadership whenever he is detained ?


She declared her unwavering support for DOS, insisting that she would not shift her position. Those plotting the downfall of the leadership, she said, are merely dreaming and will ultimately fail.


She further vowed to expose what she described as falsehoods and propaganda against the leadership whenever necessary, regardless of how old such allegations may be.


Concluding her speech, she expressed joy at seeing supporters gathered together and was met with loud chants 

As reported by Anyi Kings 
May 30 ,2026

Continue reading

at 0
Biafra post

Published On The Biafra Post 
May 29, 2026 

Barrister Alloy Ejimakor, widely regarded as Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s closest legal ally and lead counsel, has recently continued to signal what many supporters now fear could be a shocking and dangerous outcome — the possible death sentence of the former leader of IPOB, once regarded as the face of one of the world’s largest peaceful self-determination movements.
From recent public appearances and statements, 

Ejimakor appears to have technically accepted legal defeat even before the court delivers its final pronouncement ahead of the appeal hearing. Instead of reassuring supporters with a convincing legal strategy capable of securing Kanu’s freedom, he has devoted more time to public blame games, especially against Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor.

Rather than projecting confidence, Alloy Ejimakor now moves from one media platform to another explaining why he should not be blamed for the retrial process that eventually exposed Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to a possible life imprisonment sentence.

 Many observers believe his desperation for fame and influence pushed him into handling a case whose roots and technical complexities he never properly studied before taking over.

Now, as the appeal court approaches, he appears to be preparing the ground for public sympathy ahead of what many fear could be an obvious legal failure.

In his attempts to redirect blame toward Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor — who handled the case during its most aggressive stage under the Nigerian government and still secured remarkable legal victories for Kanu 

— Ejimakor conveniently ignores the technical damage that has since weakened the defense.

The painful truth many supporters believe Alloy Ejimakor is hiding is that the case now appears far more difficult to defend despite IPOB’s long-standing global reputation as a peaceful movement and Kanu’s image as its leader.

Since Kanu’s first arrest on October 14, 2015, the Nigerian government repeatedly struggled to present convincing evidence against him. For years, the government relied heavily on delays because it lacked sufficient material to sustain prosecution. Even after Kanu was extraordinarily renditioned from Kenya back to Nigeria, many still believed the government had no substantial evidence capable of destroying the defense.

However, critics now argue that Barrister Alloy Ejimakor himself technically handed damaging evidence to the prosecution through his public comments and controversial association with Simon Ekpa. His media interviews allegedly linked Simon Ekpa’s violent activities directly to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu — a move many supporters consider one of the greatest strategic errors in the entire legal battle.

The major question now being asked is simple:
If Simon Ekpa, operating from Finland, can face legal consequences over broadcasts accused of incitement and violence in the Southeast, and Alloy Ejimakor publicly suggested that Simon Ekpa acted under Kanu’s ideological influence,

 what legal argument remains strong enough to completely detach Kanu from responsibility?

This, many believe, is where the defense exhausted its strongest arguments.

For over five years, IPOB supporters worked tirelessly to shield Kanu from direct criminal linkage to violent activities. Yet many now accuse Alloy Ejimakor and his associates of destroying years of strategic legal effort because of personal ambition, media attention, and internal political interests.

Nevertheless, many Biafrans insist they do not want Kanu dead. They believe he still owes the people many unanswered questions whenever he eventually regains freedom from detention.

That is why supporters are urging Barrister Alloy Ejimakor to abandon media blame games and return to serious legal research aimed at rescuing his client from what now appears to be a looming judicial disaster.

If the appeal fails, many angry supporters may ultimately hold him responsible for the collapse of Kanu’s defense.
—
 Anyi Kings 

May 29, 2026
Continue reading

at 0
Biafra post




Specially Compiled by Anyi Kings 👑
Published On the Biafra Post 
“All is fair in war, and starvation is one of the weapons of war. I don’t see why we should feed our enemies fat in order for them to fight harder.”
— Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Nigerian Minister of Finance, July 28, 1969.


“Until now efforts to relieve the Biafran people have been thwarted by the desire of the central government to pursue total and unconditional victory and by the fear of the Ibo people that surrender means wholesale atrocities and genocide. But genocide is what is taking place right now — and starvation is the grim reaper. This is not the time to stand on ceremony, or go through channels or to observe diplomatic niceties. The destruction of an entire people is an immoral objective, even in the most moral of wars. It can never be condoned.”
— Richard Nixon, during the U.S. presidential campaign, September 9, 1968.


“Federal troops killed, or stood by while mobs killed, more than 5,000 Ibos in Warri, Sapele and Agbor.”
— New York Times, January 10, 1968.


“Mass starvation is a legitimate aspect of war.”
— Anthony Enahoro, Nigerian Commissioner for Information, press conference in New York, July 1968.


“Starvation is a weapon of war, and we have every intention of using it against the rebels.”
— Alison Ayida, Head of the Nigerian delegation, Niamey Peace Talks, July 1968.


“The Igbos must be considerably reduced in number.”
— Lagos policeman quoted in New York Review, December 21, 1967.

“One word now describes the policy of the Nigerian military government towards secessionist Biafra: genocide. It is ugly and extreme, but it is the only word which fits Nigeria’s decision to stop international Red Cross and other relief agencies from flying food to Biafra.”
— Washington Post editorial, July 2, 1969.


“In some areas in the East, Igbos were killed by local people with at least the acquiescence of the Federal forces. One thousand Igbo civilians perished in Benin in this way.”
— Max Edwards, war reporter, New York Review, December 21, 1967.


“After federal forces took over Benin, troops killed about 500 Igbo civilians after a house-to-house search with the aid of willing locals.”
— Washington Morning Post, September 27, 1967.


“The greatest single massacre occurred in the Igbo town of Asaba where 700 Igbo males were lined up and shot as terrified women and children were forced to watch.”
— London Observer, January 21, 1968.


“There has been genocide on the occasion of the 1966 massacres, in the region between the towns of Benin and Asaba where only widows and orphans remain, federal troops having, for unknown reasons, massacred all the men.”
— Le Monde (Paris), April 5, 1968.


“In Calabar, federal forces shot at least 1,000 and perhaps 2,000 Igbos, most of them civilians.”
— New York Times, January 18, 1968.


“Bestialities and indignities of all kinds were visited on the Biafrans in 1966. In Ikeja Barracks, Biafrans were forcibly fed with a mixture of human urine and faeces. In Northern Nigeria, numerous housewives and nursing mothers were violated before their husbands and children. Young girls were abducted from their homes, schools and streets and forced into intercourse with sick, demented and leprous men.”
— Eric Spiff, German War Correspondent, eyewitness account, 1967.


“650 refugee camps contained about 700,000 haggard bundles of human flotsam waiting hopelessly for a meal. Outside the camps was the remainder of an estimated four-and-a-half to five million displaced persons. Kwashiorkor scourge — a million and a half children suffered from it during January; that put the forecast death toll at another 300,000 children. More than the pogroms of 1966, more than the war casualties, more than the terror bombings, it was the experience of watching helplessly their children waste away and die that gave birth to a deep and unrelenting loathing.”
— Frederick Forsyth, British writer and war correspondent, January 21, 1969.


“The Nazis had resurrected just here as Nigerian forces.”
— Washington Post editorial, July 2, 1969.


“The loss of life from starvation continues at more than 10,000 persons per day — over 1,000,000 lives in recent months. Without emergency measures now, the number will climb to 25,000 per day within a month and 2,000,000 deaths by the end of the year. We cannot allow this to continue or those responsible to go free.”
— Senator Edward Kennedy, appeal to Americans, November 17, 1968.


“I want to see no Red Cross, no Caritas, no World Council of Churches, no Pope, no missionary, no UN delegation. I want to prevent even one Ibo from having even one piece to eat before their capitulation. We shoot at everything that moves, and when our troops march into the centre of Ibo territory, we shoot at everything, even things that do not move.”
— Benjamin Adekunle, Commander, 3rd Marine Commando Division, Nigerian Army, interview with French Radio.


“Among the large majority hailing from that tribe who are the most vocal in inciting the complete extermination of the Igbos, I often heard remarks that all Nigeria’s ills will be cured once the Igbos have been exterminated from the human map.”
— Dr. Conor Cruise O’Brien, New York Review, December 21, 1967.


Remember The Fallen
The memories of the Nigeria–Biafra War remain deeply emotional for many families across the old Eastern Region and beyond. Millions were displaced, countless civilians died from starvation and violence, and entire communities were permanently scarred by the conflict.
As Biafrans mark May 30th in remembrance of those who lost their lives, these historical quotes and reports continue to be cited by many as evidence of the suffering endured during the war years between 1967 and 1970.
#RememberThe30thMayAndKeepItHoly
#30thMaySitAtHomeIsSacrosanct

Anyi Kings 

May 28, 2026 
Continue reading
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)