TRENDING NOW

Biafra post


Before I wrote my open letter in 2022, I did what many refused to do—I reached out privately, seeking truth, balance, and accountability.
What I got in response was not transparency, but defiance.

A declaration that shook the very foundation of IPOB’s structure: “I recognize no one but Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.”

At a time he was completely cut off from the world.

So the question remains:
Who was truly in charge of IPOB finances?

Background to My Open Letter to Madam Nnenaya Anya (June 30, 2022)

By Anyi Kings 
Published On the Biafra Post 
April 4, 2026

Before I wrote my open letter to Madam Nnenaya Anya on June 30, 2022—almost four years ago—I first reached out to her privately to hear her side of the story. This was in adherence to due process, as required by IPOB’s code of conduct, and in line with my responsibility as a media practitioner to present a balanced report to Biafrans and the general public.
Unfortunately, Madam Anya, then Head of Finance of IPOB, made it clear that she did not recognize the Head of Directorate (HOD) or the media. According to her, she only recognized Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and was accountable to no one else but him.

This position raised serious concerns, especially considering that at the time, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was held incommunicado in a DSS dungeon and had no access to communicate with her. It therefore became reasonable to suspect that her instructions were coming from elsewhere—particularly from Kinsley Kanu, his younger brother—rather than through the established chain of command.
I forwarded my private chat with Madam Anya to our media head, Mazi Chukwudi Ofoma. Unfortunately, I no longer have access to that conversation, as the Facebook account I used at the time has since been disabled.
At that period, there was widespread confusion and growing complaints that funds meant for ESN had been hijacked. Mazi Prince Darlington, popularly known as (As E Dey Hot TV), was at the forefront of raising these concerns against Madam Anya.

As an investigative journalist determined to ensure fairness, I personally reached out to Mazi Ikechukwu Onuora, then Radio Biafra South Africa anchor, who frequently hosted Madam Anya for financial updates. I advised him to allow her take direct questions from Biafrans during such programs so she could address the mounting allegations transparently.
Unfortunately, the opposite happened.
In a subsequent broadcast, instead of encouraging accountability, the platform was used by Madam Anya to openly attack members of the Directorate of State (DOS)—from top to bottom, including the Head of DOS. Her secretary, Mazi Nelson Yagazie, also participated in the program and reinforced the same accusations.

The anchor failed to moderate the discussion, ask critical questions, or provide room for opposing views. The program became a campaign of calumny rather than an opportunity for transparency. Based on this, the media leadership withdrew Mazi Ikechukwu Onuora’s anchoring rights on Radio Biafra.
During a later media meeting, Mazi Nelson Yagazie was confronted with several of his claims—particularly the allegation that Mazi Chika Edoziem was receiving €2000 monthly as salary. This claim was baseless and unsupported by facts, and he failed to defend it when challenged.

What remains deeply concerning is the unresolved issue of financial accountability.
There have been persistent allegations that Madam Anya pays herself £5000 monthly, while Mazi Nnamdi Kanu receives £10,000 monthly. These claims can only be confirmed or refuted through an independent audit of IPOB’s general account, which she managed.
My findings during investigation indicated that the so-called €2000 linked to Mazi Chika Edoziem was not a salary, but rather part of operational expenses previously handled directly by Mazi Nnamdi Kanu when he was free—covering various needs and obligations. With his absence, such responsibilities naturally fell under the HOD. Madam Anya was aware of this but failed to clarify it, instead allowing false narratives to spread.

It is therefore both ironic and revealing that the same Madam Anya who once dismissed my media role has now been compelled to publicly address financial issues on an online radio platform—largely due to sustained pressure from my publications.

The fact that individuals like Nelson Yagazie, who could not defend their claims, withdrew from media responsibilities—reportedly leaving with IPOB media equipment—further underscores the level of internal breakdown at the time.
Let it be clearly stated:
This is not personal. This is about accountability.

Despite threats to my life, I will not be silenced until there is a transparent audit of IPOB accounts and every allegation of financial misappropriation is properly addressed.
Accountability cannot be selective—it must be total and transparent.
If Mazi Chika Edoziem is earning a salary, let it be clearly stated: how much, and under what constitutional provision?

Likewise, Madam Anya must openly address the allegations concerning her own financial dealings. Silence is no longer an option.
Social media may appear like a space for narratives and counter-narratives—but the day of reckoning is inevitable.

The truth does not fear investigation.
Only those hiding something do.

— Anyi Kings April 4, 2026
Biafra post


HOW BIAFRA VANGUARD MEDIA TRIGGERED THE EXPOSURE OF KANU’S FINANCIAL FRAUD — A SCANDAL THAT MAY LEAD HIM FROM JAIL TO JAIL


“Those who weaponize blackmail often forget — exposure is a double-edged sword.”
Anyi kings 

Published on the Biafra post 
April 1, 2026


Biafra Vanguard media , the so-called media arm of the yet-to-be inaugurated “100 conmen,” allegedly headed by Kanu from Sokoto prison, has unknowingly triggered the very exposure that may bury him politically and legally.


These amateur media merchants thrive on blackmail and falsehood, desperately attempting to demonize the Directorate of State (DOS) and sow distrust among Biafrans against the leadership of IPOB. In their reckless bid to accuse the leadership of financial misconduct and disobedience, they have instead opened a dangerous door—one that leads directly to Kanu’s own financial dealings.


It must be clearly stated: over 80% of these so-called “100 men” are not IPOB members and have never contributed a dime to the struggle. The remaining 20% are disgraced former members—suspended or expelled due to insubordination and criminal conduct. As always, birds of the same feather flock together.


Their regrouping is no coincidence. It is fueled by individuals closely linked to Kanu himself—proxies allegedly used in orchestrating serious financial fraud during his leadership. When the present leadership uncovered these irregularities, they acted decisively—halting the rot and restructuring the financial system. Naturally, those who benefitted from corruption became aggressive, resorting to blackmail, propaganda, and coordinated falsehood.


Their next move was predictable: a campaign to defund the struggle. They called on members to stop paying dues and abandon Radio Biafra. But let it be known—the target is not Kanu. The real victim of this sabotage is the Biafra project itself, built on the sacrifices and blood of our people.


On the other side, there are strong indications that external forces are enabling this regrouping as part of a broader political bargain tied to Kanu’s quest for release—where destabilizing the movement becomes the price for his freedom.


This has placed IPOB leadership in a difficult but defining position:

Protect a damaged image built on questionable actions, or preserve the integrity and future of the Biafra struggle through transparency and accountability.


As anger rises among members, calls for a financial probe grow louder by the day. The evidence already in circulation is deeply troubling, and the demand for truth cannot be suppressed.


The leadership has therefore urged calm, assuring Biafrans that every legal mechanism will be deployed to recover any looted funds—regardless of who is involved or how highly placed they may be. Corruption will not be tolerated. Not now, not ever.


Let it be clear: IPOB media is not here to conduct trials on social media. We will not descend into that gutter. But we will respond to blackmail with facts.


And the fact remains: the financial scandal has been exposed.

A day of reckoning is inevitable.
Those who contributed their hard-earned money deserve answers—and those answers will come. The world will know the truth.


That the loudest voice was, in fact, the greatest deception.

IPOB media does not attack.
We respond to attacks.


Anyi Kings  April 1, 2026 
Biafra post



Judgment must begin at the house of God.” — 1 Peter 4:17
“For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed.” — Luke 8:17
If we cannot cleanse our own house, then the truth we claim to fight for will eventually expose us.

Anyi Kings  Published On the Biafra post
March 31, 2026

IPOB Media has been entrusted with a sacred responsibility: to demand accountability within the Biafra struggle. This task is not convenient, and it is not meant to be. Many toes will be stepped on—but it is on those very toes that history will be written

Accountability must never be selective. If we are to stand before the world and demand justice, transparency, and good governance, then we must first apply those same standards within our own ranks.

At the center of this call is our own leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.
We must be clear: silence in the face of serious allegations is not loyalty—it is complicity. And if we ignore questions within, we lose every moral right to question leaders outside.

It has been alleged that the supreme leader receives a monthly sum of £10,000, while the Head of Finance earns £5,000 monthly. These claims, if true, raise urgent and unavoidable questions:

Under what financial framework were these payments approved?
Who authorized them?
Why were they never disclosed to the general membership?

Transparency is not optional—it is the backbone of any credible movement.
IPOB Media is in possession of documents relating to financial transactions within the IPOB general account—documents that point toward possible misappropriation, financial misconduct, and abuse of trust. These documents will remain classified until a proper and transparent probe is initiated.

But one thing is already clear: the growing concern among members cannot be silenced. Attempts to suppress or erase evidence will only deepen suspicion and widen distrust.

We call on our people to remain calm, disciplined, and focused. Accountability is not betrayal—it is a necessary purification. A movement that cannot correct itself cannot lead others to freedom.

It is deeply troubling to consider that no Nigerian public official—from the President to the lowest ward councillor—earns up to £10,000 monthly, yet such figures are now associated with a liberation movement funded by the sacrifices of ordinary people.

If a leader fighting to build a better system is perceived to be benefiting excessively from the same people he claims to liberate, then something is fundamentally wrong.

Leadership must be defined by sacrifice—not privilege.
The individuals reportedly involved include:

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu — £10,000 monthly
Uche Okafor-Mefor — £4,000 monthly (prior to the abolition of his office)
Nnennaya Anya — £5,000 monthly (Head of Finance)

Why the probe?

Because these alleged payments have no known constitutional backing and were not disclosed to the Directorate of State or the general membership prior to their discovery.

We cannot build a just society on a foundation of secrecy.

We must not be cowed.
We must not be compromised.
We must demand answers.

Loyalty without truth is slavery. We choose truth—no matter whose name is on the line.

— Anyi Kings March 31, 2026